CINEMA IS NOT A LUXURY
I now shoot on video, which is very cheap, so it's very simple for me to make a budget. All I need is enough money just to live every month, me and three or four friends: one for the sound, one to help me with the camera, another to assist me - and the actors of course. We always try to have this balance or harmony, all being paid more or less the same. I want to show that cinema is not a luxury, it's not just for very rich and glamorous people. It can be made with less money. It can be made with justice.
The people I work with understand that. But at the same time it's hard work every day, like building a house, as Ventura says. But it's something that still has a relation to the real world, which I didn't find in the films I assisted on, even some films I made with conventional crews. There was too much fiction behind the camera, and not enough in front. There were too many games played behind the camera, and in front of the camera was a mess.
It took me a long time to find this balance between what happens behind and in front of the camera - I'm talking about human relationships, about politics, about how the money is distributed, how you behave every day. For me it's more about that than the artistic work. There's a piece of paper here on my wall in my house; It's a quote by Brecht and it says that the organization took us much more time and energy than the artistic work. If you can make the organization fair, simple and human, I think that the film will find it's way, it's shots, it's heart.
No comments:
Post a Comment